Legal Opinion

United States v. Humberd

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 28, 1929No. 5318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, District Judge.

The intervener is a company engaged in buying paper from automobile dealers. The facts are that the automobile dealer, the Kritzler Motor Company, sold a Reo car to one Humberd, a bootlegger of parts, and offered the paper to the intervener, who declined to buy it because of Humberd’s reputation. Being advised of that fact, and reluctant to lose the sale, the dealer, through a salesman, sold the car again to Humberd, but had the papers made out in the name of one Smith, a brother-in-law of Humberd. Smith did not enjoy the reputation of Humberd; the intervener had no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Christie v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. United States v. KaneDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1921
  4. United States v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923
  5. United States v. One W. W. Shaw Automobile Taxi & 186 Quarts of Penwick WhiskyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. I. T. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. United States v. One Buick Coupe AutomobileDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API