Legal Opinion

United States v. One Buick Coupe Automobile

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 16, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

This is a libel for the forfeiture of one Buiek coupé, in which proceeding the General Motors Acceptance Corporation has filed an intervening petition for the allowance of a lien on the car.

The parties stipulated that the files in the clerk’s office might be considered by the court without being formally offered in evidence and marked as exhibits. I find the facts as follows:

On July 28, 1929, one William P. Treinish of Saranac Lake, N. Y., was apprehended in the town of Rindge, N. H., in the act of transporting a considerable quantity of intoxicating liquor in the Buiek…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shelliday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  2. United States v. One Cadillac Town Car AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  3. Missouri Inv. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  4. The Harbour TraderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Byroad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ledman v. GAC FINANCE CORPORATION OF BALTIMOREDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Southern Bank & Trust Co. v. PetrickRichmond City Circuit Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API