United States v. Kane
District Court, D. Montana
' Criminal prosecution by the United States against Jack Kane, On petition of intervention of the Silver Bow Motor Car Company, claimant of automobile.
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
Intervener seeks to show good cause why an auto used by defendant to transport whisky in violation of National Prohibition Act Oct. 28, 1919, c. 85, 41 Stat. 305, should not be sold. .Defendant was arrested and the car seized on August 9, 1920, in Granite county. He pleaded not guilty on August 25, changing to guilty on April 11, 1921.
Upon inquiry by the court, he asserted unincumbered ownership of the car, whereupon he was fined only $25, and the .usual order of condemnation, forfeiture, and sale of the car was then made. Intervener applied for leave.to show good…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kendall v. . BrileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Shelliday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Byroad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- State v. SeversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- United States v. BostickDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.