Legal Opinion
United States v. William Kelvin Houston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2000No. 99-50426PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
William Kelvin Houston (“Houston”) pleaded guilty to two counts of bank robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). At sentencing, the district court enhanced Houston’s base offense level by two, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2B3.1(b)(2) for express threats of death Houston allegedly made to two bank tellers during the course of the robberies. Houston asserts error in the district court’s treatment of the disputed threats of death. He relies both on Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1) (“Rule 32(c)(1)”), which requires a sentencing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Angel Fernandez-AnguloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Xavier RigbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. PettyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott KARTERMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William James HuckinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Lewis Tam, AKA Yiu Kwong Tam, United States of America v. Robert Ng, United States of America v. Co GiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Charles Robinson BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Pineda-DovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Charles ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. John Doe, United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.