Legal Opinion
United States v. William James Huckins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1995No. 94-30052PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must determine the constitutionality of a sentence premised upon hearsay statements contained in a presentence report.
I
Huekins confessed to having committed a series of bank robberies in the states of Oregon and Washington. Huekins ultimately pled guilty to six counts of unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).
The Probation Office, in its presentence report (“PSR”), concluded that Huekins was a career offender, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and calculated his base offense level at 32. The Probation Office recommended that Huekins be given a three-level…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. ComitoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MoncivaisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Brian Matthew ScheeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.