Legal Opinion
United States v. Angel Fernandez-Angulo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1990No. 87-3068PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We take this case en banc to address the interpretation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). The question before us concerns what that Rule requires of a sentencing court when a defendant challenges the accuracy of matters contained in the presentence report and what relief should be granted if the district court failed to comply with the requirements of the Rule at the time of sentencing.
Angel Fernandez-Angulo pled guilty to two counts of a superseding indictment charging him with violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841. A presentence report was prepared and distributed to the court and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Dominic L. Serino, United States of America v. John L. CloseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Juan Manuel IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Thomas TravisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Harold T. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Michael G. Doganiere v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James L. Pless and Michael L. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Edwin HoutchensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.