Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Xavier Rigby
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1990No. 89-50264PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
In this sentencing guidelines appeal, appellant Michael Xavier Rigby asks us to remand for resentencing. Rigby argues that the district court committed errors in rejecting Rigby’s contention that he was entitled to a lowered base offense level as a “minor participant” in the offense. See Sentencing Guidelines § 3B1.2(b). Rigby maintains that the district court made inadequate findings concerning his role and that there should have been an evidentiary hearing.
Rigby pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Leonard Orozco BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Tracey Donell White, United States of America v. Clarence JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Virgile Jeffrey Barrett (88-6410) and Jeffrey B. Dolan (88-6411)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mario Nelson Paz UribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Claude Paul TardiffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Wing Fook LuiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.