Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge W. FLETCHER; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD.
*1226OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Richard and Mary Lou Stengel sued Medtronic under state law when a medical device manufactured by Medtronic rendered Richard permanently paraplegic. Medtronic moved to dismiss the Stengels’ complaint, contending that the Medical Device Amendments (“MDA”) to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) preempted their state-law claims. The Stengels moved to amend their complaint to add a new state-law negligence claim. That claim alleged that Medtronic had violated a state-law duty of care by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Kristiana Burrell v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Eleanor Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Caplinger v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.