Legal Opinion

Caplinger v. Medtronic, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 21, 2015No. 13-6061PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Some medical devices are so risky they can’t be sold without the federal government’s prior approval. While even relatively simple things like bandages face some degree of federal oversight, manufacturers of pacemakers, heart valves, and the like must prove the “safety and effectiveness” of their devices to the FDA’s satisfaction before offering them for sale. Batteries of tests must be performed and presented and the agency’s premarket approval process can take years. Beyond guarding the gate to the.market square, the FDA also acts as censor for those allowed to enter.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Mentor WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Warnick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Aaron v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API