Eleanor Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a state tort suit brought by Eleanor Fulgenzi against the generic-drug manufacturer PLIVA, Inc., for failure to adequately warn of the risks of developing tardive dyskinesia from extended treatment with metoclopramide. The question is whether the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempts such suits. In 2009, the Supreme Court held that with respect to branded drug manufacturers, state failure-to-warn suits were not preempted by federal law. Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555, 129 S.Ct. 1187, 173 L.Ed.2d 51 (2009). In 2011, however, the Court held that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Wagner v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Shirley Bell v. PfizerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.