Peters v. Frye
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
This appeal is from an order of the superior court dismissing application of plaintiffs-appellants for a writ. of mandamus and quashing .the alternative writ there tofore allowed, and from judgment rendered for defendant-appellee board of supervisors (hereinafter called the board). The matter is presented upon an agreed statement of facts made pursuant to section 21-905, A.C.A.1939.
As approved by the trial court, this statement in part reads:
“Plaintiffs with others petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona, to organize an irrigation water delivery district…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- People Ex Rel. Thomson v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Brown v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. Tucson Airport AuthorityArizona Supreme Court · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.