Legal Opinion

Peters v. Frye

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1950No. 5251PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the superior court dismissing application of plaintiffs-appellants for a writ. of mandamus and quashing .the alternative writ there tofore allowed, and from judgment rendered for defendant-appellee board of supervisors (hereinafter called the board). The matter is presented upon an agreed statement of facts made pursuant to section 21-905, A.C.A.1939.

As approved by the trial court, this statement in part reads:

“Plaintiffs with others petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona, to organize an irrigation water delivery district…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People Ex Rel. Thomson v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Brown v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. Tucson Airport AuthorityArizona Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API