Legal Opinion

Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. Tucson Airport Authority

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1956No. 6079PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This action in mandamus was commenced against the Tucson Airport Authority and others to compel the cancellation of an automobile rental franchise awarded to intervener-appellee and further to compel the awarding of such franchise to appellant. The defendant Tucson Airport Authority is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of Arizona. By virtue of the power conferred by Chapter 48, A.C.A., 1939, as enacted and amended [now A.R.S. § 2-101 et seq.], and agreeably with the apparent legislative purpose, the City of Tucson leased to said corporation for a long term and upon a nominal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Brown v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Collins v. KruckerArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. DaleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Smoker v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. DaquinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport AuthorityArizona Supreme Court · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API