Legal Opinion
Thomas Shannon v. Jack Eckerd Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Third Party v. Cost Care, Inc., a California Corporation, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 16, 1995No. 93-4409PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellee Thomas Shannon (“Shannon”) filed this action after Appellant Jack Eckerd Corporation (“Eckerd”) denied his request for pre-authorization of benefits under a health plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). 1 After a bench trial, the district court found that the Plan Administrator’s denial of benefits was arbitrary and capricious and remanded the matter to the Plan Administrator for a new determination based on evidence available at the time of remand. Eckerd appeals, contending that the district court erred in several ways. We dismiss the appeal for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Huie v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Vincent Howell v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Cecilia Nichols v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Docket No. 04-1445-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23945s Kimberly J. Crocco v. Xerox Corporation and Patricia M. Nazemetz, and American Psychmanagement, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Metzger v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Randolph v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.