Bergfeld v. Stork
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE EBERSPACHER
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is an action brought against defendant for his interference with contractual relations between plaintiffs and a third party. An original complaint was filed, alleging interference with contractual relations, to which defendant filed a motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss was allowed with leave to file an amended complaint. A first amended complaint was filed by plaintiffs. The defendant filed a motion for judgment in favor of the defendant, alleging that the complaint failed to state a cause of action, which motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas M. Hannigan and Tru-Han Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Zamouski v. GerrardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Arlington Heights National Bank v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- W. P. Iverson & Co. v. Dunham Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Martin v. Federal Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Tobolt v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Bendix Corp. v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Getschow v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Millsaps v. Bankers Life Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.