Legal Opinion

Bergfeld v. Stork

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1972No. 71-82PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE EBERSPACHER

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action brought against defendant for his interference with contractual relations between plaintiffs and a third party. An original complaint was filed, alleging interference with contractual relations, to which defendant filed a motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss was allowed with leave to file an amended complaint. A first amended complaint was filed by plaintiffs. The defendant filed a motion for judgment in favor of the defendant, alleging that the complaint failed to state a cause of action, which motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas M. Hannigan and Tru-Han Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. Zamouski v. GerrardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Arlington Heights National Bank v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. W. P. Iverson & Co. v. Dunham Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Martin v. Federal Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Tobolt v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Bendix Corp. v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Getschow v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Millsaps v. Bankers Life Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API