Legal Opinion
Thomas M. Hannigan and Tru-Han Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 4, 1969No. 16934_1PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears) appeals from a judgment entered by the district court upon a jury verdict finding Sears to have wrongfully and intentionally interfered with the contractual relationship between Fabricated Products, Inc. (Fabricated) and plaintiffs Thomas M. Hannigan and the Tru-Han Corporation (Tru-Han). Upon the jury’s assessment of damages, the court awarded plaintiffs $30,000 in compensatory damages and $90,000 in exemplary damages.
Defendant contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in refusing to grant its motion for a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Eshelman v. RawaltIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Hampton v. HanrahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Beard Research, Inc. v. KatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
- Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Spray-Rite Service Corporation, an Iowa Corporation v. Monsanto Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.