Legal Opinion

Stafford Ordnance Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1952No. 49992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

Plaintiff avers that it has a just claim for the sum of $671,682.25. The material allegations of its petition are as follows:

S. On November 16, 1942, armed representatives of the United States Army, acting on orders received by the Metal Reserve Company, seized from the plaintiff certain armament as listed in Exhibit “A,” made part hereof by reference.

4. Plaintiff avers that the purpose of the seizure, allegedly to secure metal, was without merit and that such armament was seized because it was of French calibre and capable of service for the Free French.

5. On November 24, 1952, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John P. Moriarty, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  2. Pink v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Electric Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  4. Florida Dehydration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steel Improvement & Forge Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Cuban Truck & Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Farrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Kessler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. The Cuban Truck and Equipment Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API