Legal Opinion
Goodard v. Shasta S. S. Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 3809PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
Defendant moved and obtained this ■court’s permission to make Oldman Boiler Works, Inc., a third party defendant. In its opinion, dated December 23, 1948, this court said:
“Defendant, therefore, is granted leave to serve a summons and a copy of the proposed complaint upon Oldman Boiler Works, Inc. and make the latter a third-party defendant pursuant to amended Rule 14.”
Formerly Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., read:
“The third-party defendant may assert any defenses which the third-party plaintiff has to the plaintiff’s claim. The third-party…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Phœnix Bridge Co. v. CreemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lane v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1950
- Andromidas v. Theisen Bros.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
- Spring Hill Dairy Co. v. ElswickDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1957
- Baldwin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1953