Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 19, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 62-52Published

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

The ruling now announced arises out of two separate motions of the defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (later herein referred to as Indemnity Company), filed after answer, under Rule 14(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for leave to bring in as third-party defendants to this action (a) Vernon F. Kuhlmann and Wilma Kuhlmann (filing 56), and (b) Nebraska Security Bank and Jennings State Bank (filing 58). Notice of the motions has been served upon the plaintiff and its codefendants by the moving defendant.

The action was brought by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baltimore & OR Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. General Taxicab Ass'n v. O'SheaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Tullgren v. JasperDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  4. State of Missouri Ex Rel., and to Use of Ward v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  5. Lee's Inc. v. Transcontinental Underwriters of Transcontinental Ins.District Court, D. Maryland · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API