Smith v. Universal Service Motors Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The status of stockholder in a corporation is not dependent on the issuance to him of a certificate of stock. The certificate is only an evidence of ownership — a muniment of title. Though not an essential prerequisite to the fact of ownership, a certificate of stock, like all muniments of title, is a valuable paper, the possession of which evidences in permanent form the stockholder’s ownership with its incidents of rights and facilitates its sale and transfer. So important is the right to a certificate of stock that the statute under which the defendant was incorporated…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
- Cabintaxi Corporation, Formerly Known as Automated Transit, Incorporated, and Robert Edler, "Tax Matters Person," v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lehigh Structural S. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Conoco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Woods v. SpoturnoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.