Legal Opinion

Smith v. Universal Service Motors Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 27, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The status of stockholder in a corporation is not dependent on the issuance to him of a certificate of stock. The certificate is only an evidence of ownership — a muniment of title. Though not an essential prerequisite to the fact of ownership, a certificate of stock, like all muniments of title, is a valuable paper, the possession of which evidences in permanent form the stockholder’s ownership with its incidents of rights and facilitates its sale and transfer. So important is the right to a certificate of stock that the statute under which the defendant was incorporated…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  2. Cabintaxi Corporation, Formerly Known as Automated Transit, Incorporated, and Robert Edler, "Tax Matters Person," v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Lehigh Structural S. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Conoco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  5. Woods v. SpoturnoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API