Legal Opinion

Woods v. Spoturno

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 17, 1936No. scire facias, No. 25PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The plaintiff, John F. Woods, procured a judgment by default in this court in a foreign attachment proceeding against Francois Coty, the French perfumery manufacturer, and a resident of France, for $1,144,089.27. Francois Coty subsequently died and the plaintiff issued a scire facias on that judgment in order to make the personal representatives of Mr. Coty parties to it; and the case is before us on a motion of the defendants to dismiss that writ and to quash the services of it. Other contentions are made, but this motion is mainly based on…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  2. Sharon v. TerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1888
  3. Lessee of Smith v. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Bank of Eau Claire v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Kingston v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1917

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  2. Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. Mills v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Bush v. Hillman Land Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  5. Bush v. Hillman Land Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API