Legal Opinion

Cabintaxi Corporation, Formerly Known as Automated Transit, Incorporated, and Robert Edler, "Tax Matters Person," v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 1995No. 94-3862PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code entitles certain corporations to elect to be taxed almost (though not quite: see 26 U.S.C. § 1371(a)(1), and compare 26 U.S.C. § 731 with 26 U.S.C. § 311(b)) as if they were partnerships. The Subehapter S corporation’s profits and losses flow through to the shareholders and are reported on their individual income tax returns, 26 U.S.C. § 1366, thus avoiding double taxation of corporate earnings. The election, however, requires the consent of all persons who are shareholders on the date of the election, 26 U.S.C. § 1362(a)(2), which…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Albert J. Pirro, Jr., Anthony G. PirroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Stephen D. Pahl Louise A. Pahl v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Kanter v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Grigsby v. Carmell (In Re Apex Automotive Warehouse, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. Lychuk v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API