Legal Opinion
Tyco Healthcare Group, LP v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 29, 2011No. Civ. 09-264-SLRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Tyco Healthcare Group LP (“plaintiff’) filed its complaint against C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. (collectively, “defendants”) on April 21, 2009 alleging infringement of plaintiffs U.S. Patent No. 6,562,051 (“the '051 patent”). (D.I. 1) Defendants raised defenses of noninfringement, invalidity, failure to mark, obviousness-type double patenting, prosecution laches, prosecution history estoppel, and inequitable conduct. (D.I. 24) Defendants subsequently brought an unopposed motion for leave to amend and, on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.