Legal Opinion
Schultz ex rel. Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 5, 2013No. Case No. 3:11-cv-1467-SIPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
Debra A. Schultz (“Schultz”) asserts claims against her former employer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”) and Oregon’s common law of wrongful discharge. Schultz asserts three separate FMLA claims: an interference claim under 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1), a retaliation claim under 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2), and a retaliation claim under 29 U.S.C. § 2615(b). Wells Fargo moves for summary judgment against all of Schultz’s claims. Dkt. 39. For the reasons discussed below, Wells…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ader v. SimonMed Imaging IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Angie Tomlinson v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Bassett v. Truveta, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Canning v. Washington CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Christian v. Umpqua BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.