Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau General Insurance Co. of Michigan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 21, 2016No. 15-2323UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SARGUS, Chief District Judge.

When Timothy Van Camp (“Vap Camp”) suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident, he was insured by both Appellant Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of Michigan (“Farm Bureau”), a no-fault auto insurer, and an ERISA 1 plan administered by Appellee Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“BCBSM”). BCBSM contends that its Plan does not cover the medical services received by Van Camp because those services weré not medically necessary'. Although Farm Bureau had not yet paid for Van Camp’s medical bills, Farm Bureau brought an action under federal common law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  2. United States of America v. Arriva Medical, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. United States of America v. Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API