Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 26, 2017No. 3:15-cv-00846PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“R & R”) (Doc. No. 81) making the following recommendations;

1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 58) filed by Defendants Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc. and Russell MacDonnell (“RRMS Defendants”) should be granted because Plaintiff Craig Cunningham lacks Article III standing to pursue his claims;

2. If Cunningham is held to have standing, Cunningham’s request for leave to conduct limited discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ammons v. Ally Fin., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  2. Cunningham v. CBC Conglomerate, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
  3. Almosawi v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  4. Angelo v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Avila-Salazar v. Perry, WardenDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API