Cunningham v. Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“R & R”) (Doc. No. 81) making the following recommendations;
1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 58) filed by Defendants Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc. and Russell MacDonnell (“RRMS Defendants”) should be granted because Plaintiff Craig Cunningham lacks Article III standing to pursue his claims;
2. If Cunningham is held to have standing, Cunningham’s request for leave to conduct limited discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Ammons v. Ally Fin., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Cunningham v. CBC Conglomerate, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Almosawi v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Angelo v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Avila-Salazar v. Perry, WardenDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.