Legal Opinion

City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-1459PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The issue presented is whether R.C. 4117.01(F)(2), which would require Kettering to bargain collectively with a union representing its police command officers, is constitutional and, if so, whether Kettering’s local ordinance runs afoul of that provision. Kettering contends that the management of its police department is a power of local self-government with which the state cannot interfere pursuant to Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.1 The city asserts that membership in a union would lead to divided loyalty among police command officers, thus breaking down its ability to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MeadowsOhio Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API