Hicks v. Pleasants
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The trial court divided a divoreing couple's property following entry of a default divorce. The defaulted defendant in the underlying divoree asserts that the court's property division differed in kind and exceeded the amount prayed for in the complaint and is therefore void. He further argues that the court applied an incorrect standard of proof to the property division. Because we determine that the language in the prayer for relief was sufficient to put the defendant on notice that the court would divide the marital estate, we conclude the court had…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. StepanoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cook v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Wagner v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Wagner v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2013