Cook v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentMaassen, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the court's dismissal of Kim Michael Cook's petition for hearing. In my opinion, Cook's Sixth Amendment right to counsel 1 was not given the express consideration that the Constitution requires when the superior court denied him access to the funds he needed to retain the lawyer of his choice. This was "structural error" that leaves no option but a new trial, as Superior Court Judge Eric Smith correctly concluded in deciding Cook's petition for post-conviction relief. The court of appeals' opinion reversing Judge Smith's order 2 is flawed and should be reversed.
I.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.