Legal Opinion

Lengel v. Newark Newsdealers Supply Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 15, 1940No. 729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, District Judge.

The defendant moves to dismiss this action contending the court lacks jurisdiction, because the amount actually in controversy is less than $3,000, exclusive of interest and -costs; because the three employees of the defendant who designated John D. Lengel as their agent and representative to initiate and maintain this action for and on their behalf, do not individually have a claim amounting to at least $3,000, and the individual claims cannot be added together in order to total the jurisdictional amount required by law, and because, said claims cannot be joined…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Young & Jones v. Hiawatha Gin & Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1927
  4. Davis v. Age-Herald Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Lain Oil & Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1941
  2. Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  3. Divine v. LevyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  4. Stucker v. RoselleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. Allen v. MoeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API