Legal Opinion
Stucker v. Roselle
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 25, 1941No. 228PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Earl B. Stacker, brought this action on behalf of himself and all employees similarly situated against the defendant Tony F. Roselle, doing business in the name of Roselle the Hatter in Louisville, Kentucky, to recover wages in the sum of $936.94 claimed to be due under Section 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Section 207(a), Title 29, U. S.C.A. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint.
In support of the motion the defendant contends that the Court does not have jurisdiction in the matter due to the fact that the amount involved does…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schmidt v. Peoples Telephone Union of Maryville, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Gordon v. Paducah Ice Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Strand v. Garden Valley Telephone Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
- Phillips v. Star Overall Dry Cleaning Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.