Legal Opinion

Du Teau Co. v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1953No. 33241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff, Du Teau Company, Inc., doing business as Howard Burnett Co., brought this action against defendant, New Hampshire Fire Insurance Company, to reform an automobile dealer’s open insurance policy issued January 3, 1949, and thus permit recovery for damages sustained when plaintiff voluntarily parted with possession of a 1947 Packard automobile on March 4, 1949, because induced to do so by a scheme, device, or fraud. Concededly, the policy involved was the third annual duplicate renewal of an original standard form which excluded any liability in such a situation.

In that connection,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Robinson v. Union Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kear v. HausmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Beideck v. National Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Mogil v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SellersNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ridenour v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hyman-Michaels Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Jones v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ingraham v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API