Legal Opinion
Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. Perry
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 7, 1904No. 13,609PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Greene, J. :
The Coffeyville Vitrified Brick and Tile Company is a corporation engaged in manufacturing brick. T. P. Perry, one of its employees, was *298discharged, from its service and he brought this action to recover damages therefor, alleging discharge because he was a member of a labor association, The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendant prosecutes this proceeding in error.
The plaintiff based his right of action upon chapter 120, Laws of 1897 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§ 2425/2426), which reads :
“Section 1. That it shall be unlawful for any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. JulowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- State ex rel. Zillmer v. KreutzbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- DeLisio v. Alaska Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.