Legal Opinion

Roth v. Plikaytis

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 13, 2017No. D070484PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.

*285Defendant Anice Plikaytis appeals from an order awarding her attorneys' fees in a breach of contract action brought by plaintiff Debra Roth. In the published portion of the opinion, we agree with Plikaytis's contention that the trial court erred when it declined to consider previously filed documents she incorporated by reference as part of her motion. In the remaining unpublished portions of the opinion, we discuss Plikaytis's arguments that (1) the court failed to apply the lodestar method, (2) erroneously denied fees for equitable and cross-claims and for obtaining relief from bankruptcy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Key v. Tyler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Etcheson v. FCA US LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Ahn v. Sanger CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Consumer Protection Group, LLC v. Signal Brands, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API