Legal Opinion

Low v. Golden Eagle Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 2002No. A095698PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

The procedural convolutions of this 15-year-old case have resulted in what appears to be a question of first impression in insurance subrogation law: When the amount of an insured’s recovery from a tortfeasor is capped due to an error in the insured’s complaint, does this cap also limit the recovery of an insurer that intervenes to claim subrogation? While we recognize the long-standing rule that a subrogated insurer stands in the shoes of its insured and is subject to all defenses that may be asserted against the insured’s claim, under the unique circumstances of this case…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Liberty International Underwriters Canada v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  2. Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Korda v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API