Legal Opinion
Korda v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 4, 2006No. 04-530PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. This case arises from a fatal car accident. Appellants in this case are the Estate of Murray Korda (the Estate) and one of two uninsured motorist carriers (UIM carriers) 1 who insured Mr. Korda at the time of the accident. Below, the UIM carriers filed suit under the Estate’s name with its permission against defendant Chicago Insurance Company (Chicago), the insurer of Champlain Valley Speech and Language Practice, LLC (CVSLP), the company whose employee caused the accident, for failure to defend the underlying lawsuit, which had resulted in a stipulated judgment of $2,000,000 against…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Natalia Flores v. Cameron County, Texas, Cameron County, Texas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Richards v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. KimballSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- US BANK NAT. ASS'N v. KimballSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Zlotoff Foundation, Inc. v. Town of South HeroSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Humphrey v. Vermont Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Choiniere and P&D Consulting, Inc. v. Marshall and Beach, PPLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.