Legal Opinion

Arbitration Between Thomas v. Western National Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1997No. C0-95-1380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

This case raises the question as to how the term “disability” should be defined under the lapse provision of the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act. We affirm the court of appeals and hold that the arbitrator appropriately defined the term by its plain and ordinary meaning.

On November 8, 1991, Plaintiff Lehanne Thomas was injured in a car accident. She subsequently received medical treatment from December 3-16, 1991 for mild headaches and soreness in her neck, back, and shoulders, which was paid under the no-fault *290coverage of her insurance policy with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Otis Lodge, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Chacos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Dakota v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Arbitration Between Racine v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Arbitration Between Thomas v. Western National Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API