Legal Opinion
County of Dakota v. Cameron
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 26, 2012No. A11-1273PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
In this eminent-domain proceeding, appellant challenges the district court’s award of damages under Minnesota’s minimum-compensation statute, Minn. Stat. § 117.187. Appellant argues that the district court misconstrued section 117.187 in determining minimum compensation for the taking of his property and that the district court erred in refusing to award him all of the attorney fees that he requested. Because the district court properly construed section 117.187 and awarded appellant just compensation, and because the district court did not err in determining a reasonable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Head v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County of Dakota v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Commissioner Of Transportation v. KrauseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019