Legal Opinion

Arbitration Between Racine v. AMCO Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 22, 2000No. C8-99-1586PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge

Appellant AMCO Insurance Company contests the district court’s denial of its motion to vacate an arbitration award. AMCO contends that the arbitrator clearly exceeded his authority by finding the economic consumption of the decedent irrelevant when determining the extent of respondent surviving spouse’s dependency under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. We reverse the district court’s ruling, vacate the arbitration award, and remand for factual findings on dependency.

FACTS

Rita Racine died in an automobile accident. Her husband, respondent Richard Racine, submitted a claim to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Peevy v. Mutual Services Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gratech Co. v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API