Legal Opinion

Arbitration Between Thomas v. Western National Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1997No. C0-95-1380Published

1Opinion of the Court

562 N.W.2d 289 (1997)

In re the Arbitration Between Lehanne THOMAS, Respondent,

v.

WESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP, Petitioner, Appellant.

No. C0-95-1380.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 24, 1997.

Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Paula Duggan Vraa, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Meshbesher & Spence, Mark D. Streed, Anthony J. Nemo, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Schwebel, Goetz, Seiben & Moskal, P.A., Peter W. Riley, Lisa K. Morley, Minneapolis, amicus curiae.

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

This case raises the question as to how the term "disability" should be defined under the lapse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Otis Lodge, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Chacos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Arbitration Between Thomas v. Western National Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API