Legal Opinion

Simandle v. Vista De Santa Barbara Associates, LP

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 2009No. B209735PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Ronald Simandle and Warren Simandle appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court found that appellants abandoned a statutory right under the Mobilehome Residency Law (Civ. Code, §§ 798, 798.78, subd. (a)) to sell their parents’ mobilehome at the Vista de Santa Barbara Mobilehome Park. The trial court ruled that park owner, respondent Vista de Santa Barbara Associates, LP, could remove the mobilehome at appellants’ expense. (§ 798.78, subd. (b).)

Appellants argue, inter alia, that the law abhors a forfeiture. This is true but the law also abhors a public and private…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Zhou v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Sequoia Park Associates v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Canyon View Ltd. v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API