Legal Opinion

D. W. Clark Road Equipment, Inc. v. Murray Walter, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 16, 1983No. 82-410PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The defendants, Murray Walter, Inc. (Murray Walter) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company (USF&G) appeal from the granting of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, permitting the plaintiff to recover $58,282.80 on a performance bond. The plaintiff, D. W. Clark Road Equipment, Inc. (Clark) has cross-appealed from the denial of its claim for interest and attorney’s fees.

The following underlying facts are not in dispute. In 1979, Murray Walter, a general contractor, entered into a public works contract with the City of Concord in connection with the construction of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Montrone v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Arsenault v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Community Oil Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  5. Carbur's, Inc. v. a & S Office Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Keshishian v. CMC RadiologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Albee v. Wolfeboro RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API