D. W. Clark Road Equipment, Inc. v. Murray Walter, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
The defendants, Murray Walter, Inc. (Murray Walter) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company (USF&G) appeal from the granting of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, permitting the plaintiff to recover $58,282.80 on a performance bond. The plaintiff, D. W. Clark Road Equipment, Inc. (Clark) has cross-appealed from the denial of its claim for interest and attorney’s fees.
The following underlying facts are not in dispute. In 1979, Murray Walter, a general contractor, entered into a public works contract with the City of Concord in connection with the construction of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Montrone v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Arsenault v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Community Oil Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Carbur's, Inc. v. a & S Office Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Keshishian v. CMC RadiologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Albee v. Wolfeboro RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.