Legal Opinion

State v. Hermsdorf

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 20, 1992No. 90-181PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendants, Gary Hermsdorf and the Queen City Pharmacy, Inc., doing business as The Medicine Shoppe (the Pharmacy) appeal their convictions in the Superior Court {Flynn, J.) for Medicaid fraud under RSA 167:17-b, 1(a) and RSA 167:17-c, 1(b). We affirm.

*362In January 1985, an agent of the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (Fraud Unit) began investigating the Pharmacy for possible fraudulent Medicaid billing. The investigation was conducted in two ways. The first entailed interviews with Medicaid recipients who had their prescriptions filled at the Pharmacy. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. InselburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. State v. Manchester News Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DaggettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Collins v. MartellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Flanagan v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. People v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. State v. ChickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API