Commonwealth v. Slaton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Judge.
In the instant appeal, the Commonwealth presents a question of first impression in this Court relating to a prosecution under the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. § 780-101, et seq., (“Controlled Substances Act” or “Act”). The issue presented is whether the failure of narcotics agents to disclose, at the time of a second search, the change in the focus of their investigation, rendered the consent to that search invalid.
As the parties concede, in reviewing a suppression court’s ruling, an appellate court is bound by factual findings supported…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. CleckleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. IvySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. PetrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. CabanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.