Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Slaton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1992No. 105 W.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Judge.

In the instant appeal, the Commonwealth presents a question of first impression in this Court relating to a prosecution under the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. § 780-101, et seq., (“Controlled Substances Act” or “Act”). The issue presented is whether the failure of narcotics agents to disclose, at the time of a second search, the change in the focus of their investigation, rendered the consent to that search invalid.

As the parties concede, in reviewing a suppression court’s ruling, an appellate court is bound by factual findings supported…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. CleckleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. IvySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. CabanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API