Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,856 Peter R. Briney v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1986No. 84-3874Published

1Opinion of the Court

782 F.2d 585

Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 10,856

Peter R. BRINEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-3874.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 13, 1985.

Decided Jan. 28, 1986.

Lee E. Plakas (argued), Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos, Canton, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

George J. Moscarino, Peter A. Carfagna, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, Paul G. Crist (argued), for defendants-appellees.

Before MARTIN, CONTIE and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

1

Plaintiffs Peter and Carolyn Briney, in this products…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API