Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Tabor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1931No. 20304PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, V. C. J.

This action was commenced in the district court of McIntosh county by defendant in error herein, B. H. Tabor, against plaintiff in error herein, Jennetta Barnett, for recovery under a written contract of employment for at torney fees. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

On the hearing of the case in the trial court a jury was selected and sworn to hear the cause. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant made their respective statements; and plaintiff moved for judgment upon the statement of counsel for defendant; and defendant requested leave to file…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Schuber v. McDuffeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Stubblefield ex rel. Stubblefield v. CrawfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Lowe & Campbell Athletic Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Jenkins v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Seidenbach's v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API