Legal Opinion

Interstate General Corp. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1985No. 84-641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, the manager of an apartment complex, challenges a decision by the Rental Housing Commission ordering a monetary refund to tenants, pursuant to the Rental Housing Act of 1977 (the “Act”), D.C.Law 2-54, D.C.Code § 45-1681 et seq. (1980 Supp.), on the ground that a loss of air conditioning in tenants' apartments during the summer months of 1979 constituted a substantial reduction in service.

Petitioner also seeks review of the Commission’s rulings that a purportedly exculpatory clause in the lease agreement did not relieve it of liability for the reduction in service, and that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Totz v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bulls v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Weaver Bros. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ungar v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Golden Gateway Center v. San Francisco Residential StabilizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API