Interstate General Corp. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Petitioner, the manager of an apartment complex, challenges a decision by the Rental Housing Commission ordering a monetary refund to tenants, pursuant to the Rental Housing Act of 1977 (the “Act”), D.C.Law 2-54, D.C.Code § 45-1681 et seq. (1980 Supp.), on the ground that a loss of air conditioning in tenants' apartments during the summer months of 1979 constituted a substantial reduction in service.
Petitioner also seeks review of the Commission’s rulings that a purportedly exculpatory clause in the lease agreement did not relieve it of liability for the reduction in service, and that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Totz v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bulls v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Weaver Bros. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ungar v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Golden Gateway Center v. San Francisco Residential StabilizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999