Legal Opinion
Golden Gateway Center v. San Francisco Residential Stabilization
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 2, 1999No. A083297PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALKER, J.
In the published portion of this opinion we hold that a landlord who undertakes to perform reasonably necessary repair and maintenance work on rental property, which has the effect of temporarily interfering with or preventing the tenant’s full use of housing services, but does not substantially interfere with the right to occupancy of the premises as a residence, does not effectuate a decrease in housing services within the meaning of the San Francisco rent control ordinance. Accordingly, we hold respondent San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Looney v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Fox v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Doric Realty Co. v. Union City Rent Leveling BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Interstate General Corp. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larson v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ocean Park Associates v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Baychester Shopping Center, Inc. v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- S.F. Apartment Assn. v. City & County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2024