Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 7, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

The appellees, Z. A. Bennett and M. E. Scyster, are partners engaged in the insurance business in Paducah, Kentucky, in the course of which they also do on the side a small real estate business. On March 13,1924, they received a letter from W. H. Parks, who lived at Hartford, Kentucky, but who was then in Staunton, Virginia, inquiring whether or not the appellees could procure an option on a gravel pit somewhere near Gravel Switch, Kentucky, as he had a party who was interested in such a proposition. Bennett took this Parks letter and went to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Bruce v. HastingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
  3. Gottschalk v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. George v. Sohn's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Tussey v. FeltyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harmount & Woolf Tie Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Allison v. CampbellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Crider v. Providence Coal Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Elcomb Coal Co. v. Hall Land & Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Pearl Bowling Co. v. Hensley HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API