Allison v. Campbell
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.
In the motion for rehearing the defendant in error contends that the only question which the Supreme Court can legitimately consider is “whether, in the absence of a compliance with the provision of the chapter and title referred to relating to limited partnerships, was appellant, Allison, liable as a matter of law on the note in question, regardless of the evidence tending to show that Oxford was without authority to execute the note declared upon and that ap-pellee, Campbell, at the time he took the note, had knowledge of such want of authority or of such circumstances as put him on notice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Buzard & Hilliard v. McAnulty & MostyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Martin v. HemphillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Marshall v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aboussie Ex Rel. Spell v. AboussieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Thompson v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Lane v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Heid Bros. v. Mueller-Huber Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Allison v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.