Harmount & Woolf Tie Co. v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Richardson
Reversing.
The dominant question in this case is, What are the contractual relations of the Harmount & Woolf Tie Company and Floyd Gross and Clayton Gross during the period of time covered by their contracts?
In March, 1927, the Harmount & Woolf Tie Company and Floyd Gross entered into a written contract for the purpose of manufacturing timber on a tract of: land in Leslie county into ties and logs, and delivering same. It was stipulated therein, among other things, that Gross was to be charged with $3,000, the purchase price of the standing timber, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Bowen v. Gradison Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
- Kentucky Cottage Industries, Inc. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Middletown Engineering Co. v. Main Street Realty, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- New Independent Tobacco Warehouse, No. 3, Inc. v. LathamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Walling v. American Needlecrafts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.