Legal Opinion

Harmount & Woolf Tie Co. v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Reversing.

The dominant question in this case is, What are the contractual relations of the Harmount & Woolf Tie Company and Floyd Gross and Clayton Gross during the period of time covered by their contracts?

In March, 1927, the Harmount & Woolf Tie Company and Floyd Gross entered into a written contract for the purpose of manufacturing timber on a tract of: land in Leslie county into ties and logs, and delivering same. It was stipulated therein, among other things, that Gross was to be charged with $3,000, the purchase price of the standing timber, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Bowen v. Gradison Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
  2. Kentucky Cottage Industries, Inc. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  3. Middletown Engineering Co. v. Main Street Realty, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  4. New Independent Tobacco Warehouse, No. 3, Inc. v. LathamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  5. Walling v. American Needlecrafts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API